How I Overcame My 50-Year Struggle With Gynecomastia

Before we get started, here's a little story from one of my clients, Sammie Fields.
Hey there I’m Sammie.

I’m in my 70s now and I’m finally enjoying my life as a masculine-looking guy. I struggled with gynecomastia ever since puberty. Back in the day it was totally unheard of for a man to have breasts.

Man boobs were quite a rare thing. If you think having man boobs is bad now, try having them in the 60s. I spent my entire life in fear that someone would notice my breasts. I stayed away from women - I was horrified of the bedroom. I also stayed away from the beach and only got out wearing the thickest of clothing to try and conceal myself.

Back then there was no internet, and no information out there to help me. I tried everything I could to try and get rid of my man boobs. I lost weight and tried different diets but all to no avail.

One day however, just a few years ago I came across a newspaper article.

This article complained of how male fish in our waters were becoming feminized. Scientists had studied these male fish and found how they had developed feminine characteristics, even to the point of producing eggs! Apparently this was due to the prevalence of the female hormone estrogen in our water supply.

Apparently, due to most government water filtration systems (including the US), estrogen passes unfiltered right into our taps, and straight into your belly when you drink that glass of water.

The estrogen is being absorbed by us and is resulting in modern man having low sperm counts, fertility problems and gynecomastia. Heck it might even be responsible for the boom in the male cosmetics industry (joke).

So I went out there, did some research and found some other shocking sources of estrogen that exist especially in the modern environment, but were also there in the past albeit in much lower quantities and not as widespread back in the day.

Why am I telling you all this?

Well I lost my man boobs in my mid-sixties. The only way I managed to succeed was after I armed myself with the facts, and all the information I needed to know about the very root cause of my gynecomastia.

If I could get rid of my gynecomastia in my sixties, then I know for a fact that anyone else can do it too. So if you're about to give up or you have given up and are ready to face the world as a pseudo-man, then I'm here to tell you to wake up! Get out of that trance, shake yourself up and inform yourself of real working tactics that have been proven time and time again to help many thousands of guys lose their man boobs permanently using all-natural methods.

And I can't think of a better person to help you than my good friend Robert Hull. I leave you to his very capable hands and I'm sure that you will learn much on his new blog.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Genes' 'On/Off' Switches Yield Clues to Breast Cancer

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, March 23 (HealthDay News) -- Scientists may have developed a new way of predicting when breast cancer will spread.

Two varieties of what scientists call "epigenetic signatures" seem to distinguish more aggressive cancers from less aggressive ones, according to a new study.

Epigenetic alterations do not involve changes to the sequencing of the genes themselves. Instead, they involve alterations in the outer wrapping that holds genes within the chromosome. This chromosomal casing helps determine whether the genes will activate and at what intensity.

Environmental factors, including diet, stress, illness or environmental pollutants can all influence epigenetics, experts note.

The findings could not only lead someday to a new diagnostic screening tool to parse out more aggressive cancers that might benefit from more aggressive treatment, but could also "open the door for new physiological targets" for therapies, explained Dr. Timothy A. Chan, senior author of a paper appearing March 23 in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

It's also not out of the question that modifiable environmental factors might be identified that contribute to the cancers, Chan said.

How to tell if a particular tumor will spread (metastasize), and then finding ways to prevent that are major goals of the researchers. Patients usually die from a cancer that has metastasized, not from localized tumors.

This international consortium of researchers collected a variety of different types of breast cancers -- some were hormone receptor-positive, some negative, some had spread and some had not -- then analyzed their methylation profiles.

Methylation refers to the epigenetic "marks" left on the genome.

"To our surprise, we noted that there appear to be two main epigenomic subgroups," said Chan, who is a lab head and attending physician at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.

This was a surprise because scientists have identified myriad different types of breast cancers based on their genetics and other characteristics.

In this case, one group showed high methylation and one showed low.

The high-methylation group "tended to be pretty stable at the genomic level and were composed primarily of hormone-positive cancers," Chan said. "The [low-methylation] group includes all the hormone-negative group and about half of hormone-positive cancers."

And women with high-methylation tumors did much better than the other group, independent of their hormone-receptor status.

The team is now working on a test to distinguish the two epigenetic types and are investigating what drives these changes, which have also been observed in colon cancer and the deadly brain cancer glioblastoma.

"What we're probably looking at is some fundamental process that becomes dysregulated and helps drive the cancers," Chan said.

"This [study] allows us to further subset breast cancers into those that are likely to metastasize and those that aren't likely to metastasize, and that's helpful," noted one expert, Dr. Patrick Borgen, chairman of the department of surgery at Maimonides Medical Center in New York City.

But, Borgen cautioned, "the technology that [does this categorization] is far from the grasp of day-to-day clinicians. [The study is] an important foundation for further research."

MedicalNewsCopyright � 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

SOURCES: Timothy A. Chan, M.D., Ph.D., lab head and attending physician, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Patrick Borgen, M.D., chairman, department of surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, New York City; March 23, 2011, Science Translational Medicine


Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/guide.asp?s=rss&a=141153&k=Womens_Health_General

health care for pregnant women mental health in women health of women health supplements for women health and fitness women

No comments:

Post a Comment