How I Overcame My 50-Year Struggle With Gynecomastia

Before we get started, here's a little story from one of my clients, Sammie Fields.
Hey there I’m Sammie.

I’m in my 70s now and I’m finally enjoying my life as a masculine-looking guy. I struggled with gynecomastia ever since puberty. Back in the day it was totally unheard of for a man to have breasts.

Man boobs were quite a rare thing. If you think having man boobs is bad now, try having them in the 60s. I spent my entire life in fear that someone would notice my breasts. I stayed away from women - I was horrified of the bedroom. I also stayed away from the beach and only got out wearing the thickest of clothing to try and conceal myself.

Back then there was no internet, and no information out there to help me. I tried everything I could to try and get rid of my man boobs. I lost weight and tried different diets but all to no avail.

One day however, just a few years ago I came across a newspaper article.

This article complained of how male fish in our waters were becoming feminized. Scientists had studied these male fish and found how they had developed feminine characteristics, even to the point of producing eggs! Apparently this was due to the prevalence of the female hormone estrogen in our water supply.

Apparently, due to most government water filtration systems (including the US), estrogen passes unfiltered right into our taps, and straight into your belly when you drink that glass of water.

The estrogen is being absorbed by us and is resulting in modern man having low sperm counts, fertility problems and gynecomastia. Heck it might even be responsible for the boom in the male cosmetics industry (joke).

So I went out there, did some research and found some other shocking sources of estrogen that exist especially in the modern environment, but were also there in the past albeit in much lower quantities and not as widespread back in the day.

Why am I telling you all this?

Well I lost my man boobs in my mid-sixties. The only way I managed to succeed was after I armed myself with the facts, and all the information I needed to know about the very root cause of my gynecomastia.

If I could get rid of my gynecomastia in my sixties, then I know for a fact that anyone else can do it too. So if you're about to give up or you have given up and are ready to face the world as a pseudo-man, then I'm here to tell you to wake up! Get out of that trance, shake yourself up and inform yourself of real working tactics that have been proven time and time again to help many thousands of guys lose their man boobs permanently using all-natural methods.

And I can't think of a better person to help you than my good friend Robert Hull. I leave you to his very capable hands and I'm sure that you will learn much on his new blog.

Friday, April 29, 2011

Omega-3s Linked To Higher Risk Of Aggressive Prostate Cancer


Featured Article
Academic Journal
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate Cancer
Also Included In: Nutrition / Diet;��Heart Disease;��Men's health
Article Date: 26 Apr 2011 - 8:00 PDT email icon email to a friendprinter icon printer friendlywrite icon opinions

Current Article Ratings:


Patient / Public: 4 stars

4 (4 votes)

Healthcare Prof: 3 stars

2.6 (5 votes)

Article Opinions: 4 posts

US researchers were stunned to discover that higher blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids, normally promoted as good for the heart, were linked to higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer, and conversely, raised levels of trans-fats, considered bad for the heart, were linked to a lower risk.

However, neither of the fats was found to be linked to risk of low-grade prostate cancer.

These were the findings of the largest study ever to look at links between dietary fats and prostate cancer risk.

Lead and corresponding author Theodore M. Brasky, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington, told the press:

"We were stunned to see these results and we spent a lot of time making sure the analyses were correct."

He and colleagues in the Hutchinson Center's Public Health Sciences Division, and also from the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and the National Cancer Institute, analyzed a subset of data on more than 3,4000 men taking part in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, a large nationwide randomized clinical trial, involving more than 19,000 men aged 55 and over, that tested the performance of the drug finasteride in preventing prostate cancer.

Their paper was published this week in the American Journal of Epidemiology. Brasky, a postdoctoral research fellow in the Hutchinson Center's Cancer Prevention Program, said:

"Our findings turn what we know - or rather what we think we know - about diet, inflammation and the development of prostate cancer on its head and shine a light on the complexity of studying the association between nutrition and the risk of various chronic diseases."

Brasky and colleagues found that men with the highest blood levels of docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, an omega-3 fatty acid that lowers inflammation and is common in fatty fish, had 2.5 times the risk of developing aggressive, high-grade prostate cancer compared to men with the lowest blood leves of DHA.

They also found that men with the highest blood percentages of trans-fatty acids, which have been linked to inflammation and heart disease, and are common in processed foods made with partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, had a 50% reduced risk of developing high-grade prostate cancer.

In contrast, they found neither of the two types of fatty acids was linked to raised risk of low-grade prostate cancer.

They also found that omega-6 fatty acid, common in most vegetable oils, and which has been linked to inflammation and heart disease, was not linked to raised risk of either high-grade or low-grade prostate cancer.

The results stunned the researchers, whose prime motive was to test the idea that concentrations of these various types of fatty acids in the blood would show some relationship with prostate cancer risk, in a similar pattern to their various links with inflammation and heart disease risk.

"Specifically, we thought that omega-3 fatty acids would reduce and omega-6 and trans-fatty acids would increase prostate cancer risk," said Brasky.

Why omega-3s should be linked to raised risk of high-grade prostate cancer is a mystery to the researchers.

Brasky said they need to do more research on it, but speculated that perhaps omega-3s affect biological mechanisms other than inflammation, and these have a bigger effect on the development of some prostate cancers.

Although many nutritionists and doctors recommend 450 mg daily dose of omega-3 DHA as part of a healthy diet, there are currently no official guidelines in the US on recommended daily allowance.

Half of the participants in the nationwide trial developed prostate cancer during the course of the study, and half did not. The trial is considered unique because all participants underwent biopsy to confirm the presence or absence of prostate cancer.

Few of the participants took fish oil supplements, the most common non-dietary source of omega-3 fatty acids, which are known to prevent heart disease and other diseases caused by inflammation. Most of the participants got their omega-3s from consuming fish.

Brasky and colleagues don't think that these findings should discourage men from continuing to get their omega-3s from oily fish or food supplements.

"Overall, the beneficial effects of eating fish to prevent heart disease outweigh any harm related to prostate cancer risk," said Brasky, stressing that the study highlights the complexity of nutrition and its links with disease risk, and we need to study them much more rigorously before jumping to conclusions.

Funds from the National Cancer Institute helped pay for the study.

"Serum Phospholipid Fatty Acids and Prostate Cancer Risk: Results From the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial."
Theodore M. Brasky, Cathee Till, Emily White, Marian L. Neuhouser, Xiaoling Song, Phyllis Goodman, Ian M. Thompson, Irena B. King, Demetrius Albanes, and Alan R. Kristal
Am. J. Epidemiol. first published online 24 April 2011
DOI:10.1093/aje/kwr027

Additional source: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Please rate this article:
(Hover over the stars
then click to rate)
Patient / Public:
or Health Professional:

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Omega 3s And Prostate Cancer - Told You So

posted by keira on 26 Apr 2011 at 9:37 am

told u those baby foods fortified with tuna oil were a bad idea!!!

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Wish they studied non-animal sources of Omegas

posted by Greg on 26 Apr 2011 at 9:51 am

There is another factor here: Fish protein. I wish this study included omega-3s extracted from flax or hemp seed. Some other studies indicate animal protein may cause cancer.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Omega 3

posted by Dr. Jennifer Adolph on 26 Apr 2011 at 6:06 pm

The description of the study does not specify dietary intake of Omega-3 fatty acids, only blood levels. Therefore it is impossible to evaluate whether the DHA levels are 1) causative or 2) raised as a sequela; of agressive prostate cancer.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


PCBs and other contaminants?

posted by PW on 26 Apr 2011 at 7:59 pm

I recall reading something that indicated that PCBs and other dioxin-like contaminants cause not only prostate cancer at younger ages, but more often in aggressive forms. There is a third variable problem and the correlation found between omega 3s and cancer does not prove causation. That is, it may be PCBs (or some other unidentified variable) in fish contribute to the cancer rates, not the omega 3 fatty acids.

| post followup | alert a moderator |



Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:




Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd � 2004-2011 All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/223373.php

indian women health women and health care pregnant women health womens health vitamins women reproductive health issues

No comments:

Post a Comment